Short Leg Syndrome resulting from a pure ascending postural distortion pattern (published study 2006)
Pitkin H., Pheasant H. Sacrarthrogenetic telalgia. II A study of sacral mobility. J Bone Jt Surg. 1936;18(2):365–375
Giles L.G. Lumbosacral facetal “joint angles” associated with leg length inequality. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1981;20(4):233–238
Drerup B., Hierholzer E. Movement of the human pelvis and displacement of related anatomical landmarks on the body surface. J Biomech. 1987;20(10):971–977
Rothbart BA, Esterbrook L, 1988. Excessive Pronation: A Major Biomechanical Determinant in the Development of Chondromalacia and Pelvic Lists. Journal Manipulative Physiologic Therapeutics 11(5): 373-379.
Cummings G., Scholz J.P., Barnes K. The effect of imposed leg length difference on pelvic bone symmetry. Spine. 1993;18(3):368–373
Beaudoin L., Zabjek K.F., Leroux M.A., Coillard C., Rivard C.H. Acute systematic and variable postural adaptations induced by an orthopaedic shoe lift in control subjects. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(1):40–45.
Young R.S., Andrew P.D., Cummings G.S. Effect of simulating leg length inequality on pelvic torsion and trunk mobility. Gait Posture. 2000;11(3):217–223
Krawiec C.J., Denegar C.R., Hertel J., Salvaterra G.F., Buckley W.E. Static innominate asymmetry and leg length discrepancy in asymptomatic collegiate athletes. Man Ther. 2003;8(4):207–213
Rothbart BA. Relationship of Functional Leg-Length Discrepancy to Abnormal Pronation. Journal American Podiatric Medical Association; 2006;96(6):499-507
Khamis S, Yizhar Z. Effect of feet hyperpronation on pelvic alignment in a standing position. Gait & Posture; 2007;25(1):127-134
There are many non-original published papers that merely comment on the position of the innominate bone relative to the short or long leg.
There is no consistency in these papers: some link the short leg to a posteriorly rotated ipsilateral innominate bone, others link the short leg to an anteriorly rotated ipsilateral innominate bone.
These papers are opines rather than research based and thus have not been included in the above list.
Short Leg Syndrome aka Functional Leg Length Discrepancy
Revised July 29, 2019
Inventor and Designer of Postural Control Insoles
Short Leg Syndrome (aka Leg Length Discrepancy)
This is one of the most contested subjects on foot/pelvic mechanics. An internet search may totally confound you.
Some internet sites claim that a forward rotation of the innominate bone results in a lengthening of the leg on that same side (e.g., anterior rotation of left innominate bone results in a long left leg).
Other sites claim that a forward rotation of the innominate bone will result in a shortening of the leg on that same side (e.g. anterior rotation of the left innominate results in a short left leg).
Obviously this is confusing and makes no sense. Which claim is correct?
In actuality, the truth is obvious if one looks at the anatomical position of the acetabulum within the innominate bone. If the innominate rotates anterior/externally (forward), the acetabulum must rotate cephalad and posteriorly (See animation below).
As the acetabulum rotates cephalad and posteriorly, the femur head, which is securely held within the acetabulum (by the Iliofemoral and Ischiofemoral ligaments), rotates upwards and backwards. This shortens the leg and hyperextends the knee.
If the left foot is more pronated then the right foot, the left femur head will be more cephalad and posteriorly displaced relative to the right femur head. Clinically you will diagnose the patient as having a Short Left Leg Syndrome.
If the right foot is more pronated then the left foot, the right femur head will be more cephalad and posteriorly displaced relative to the left femur head. Clinically you will diagnose the patient as having a Short Right Leg Syndrome.
Rothbart BA 2006. Relationship of Functional Leg-Length Discrepancy to Abnormal Pronation. Journal American Podiatric Medical Association; 96(6):499-507